{"id":8199,"date":"2026-06-02T12:55:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T12:55:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/?p=8199"},"modified":"2026-06-04T07:09:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T07:09:01","slug":"test-automation-in-agile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/agile\/test-automation-in-agile\/","title":{"rendered":"Test Automation in Agile: Scrum Teams Implementation Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>Key Highlights of Test Automation in Agile<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Agile testing activities consume 20 to 30% of total sprint effort when distributed correctly across developers, QA, and product owners (<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/monday.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">monday.com<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Agile Testing Guide, 2026).<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Teams that automate consistently catch bugs 60% earlier in the development lifecycle than teams that rely on end-of-sprint manual testing.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) with frameworks like Cucumber improves collaboration between Product Owners, developers, and QA by writing test scenarios in plain language before code begins.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Definition of Done for every user story should include &#8220;automated tests written and passing in CI&#8221; to prevent automation debt from accumulating sprint by sprint.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over all enterprises will adopt AI for test authoring and maintenance by end of 2026.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Introduction<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Test automation in agile is the practice of integrating automated quality checks into every phase of an agile sprint, from story writing to retrospective, so that teams can validate features continuously and deploy with confidence. Without test automation, agile delivery speed creates quality debt: teams ship features faster than manual testing can validate, defects accumulate, and release confidence declines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to monday.com&#8217;s 2026 Agile Testing Guide, testing activities should consume 20 to 30% of total sprint effort. In teams without automation, most of that effort goes to manual regression, leaving little capacity for exploratory testing, risk-based quality work, or test strategy improvement. Automation shifts that balance: repetitive regression runs on autopilot, and QA engineers apply human judgment where it creates the most value.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This guide covers the specific steps for implementing test automation in agile Scrum teams: from writing the first automated test to integrating automation into sprint ceremonies and establishing the practices that make it sustainable. For teams also managing Jira-based sprint workflows, NextAgile&#8217;s<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/workshop\/jira-training-masterclass-workshop\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">JIRA Training Masterclass<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> covers automated test status visibility within Jira sprints.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Sprint-by-Sprint Implementation Guide for Test Automation in Agile<\/b><\/h2>\n<h3><b>Pre-Sprint: Include Test Cases in Story Refinement<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Test automation in agile begins before the sprint starts. During backlog refinement:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Actions for QA engineers in refinement:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Review each user story and draft test scenarios in plain language (using Given\/When\/Then format if practicing BDD)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identify automation candidates: any scenario that will need to be re-tested every sprint after this feature ships<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Flag stories that lack testable acceptance criteria and block them from sprint inclusion<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Estimate automation effort separately from development effort in story points or hours<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This pre-sprint practice prevents the most common anti-pattern: writing user stories that developers consider done when the feature is coded, but that have no automation and no acceptance criteria that QA can verify.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-8200 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile.png\" alt=\"Test Automation in Agile\" width=\"800\" height=\"533\" data-sitemapexclude=\"true\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile.png 800w, https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile-600x400.png 600w, https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Sprint-by-Sprint-Implementation-Guide-for-Test-Automation-in-Agile-150x100.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/p>\n<h3><b>Sprint Day 1 to 3: Development + Unit Test Creation (Parallel)<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>For developers:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Write unit tests alongside production code, not after it<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apply Test-Driven Development (TDD) for complex business logic: write the failing test first, write the code to pass it<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Maintain <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/junit.org\/junit5\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><b>unit test<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> coverage above the team&#8217;s agreed threshold (target: 70% line coverage for all new code)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>For QA engineers:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Begin writing automation scripts for the sprint&#8217;s stories while developers build features<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use the acceptance criteria as the specification for test script logic<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Set up or verify test data in the shared test environment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Sprint Day 4 to 8: Feature Testing and Automation Completion<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Acceptance testing:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QA engineers test completed stories against acceptance criteria<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automated tests run as features are completed, not at end of sprint<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Failed tests are assigned immediately to the developer responsible<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Automation completion requirements before story closure:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">All automated tests for the story are passing in CI<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Test scripts are in version control and reviewed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">New tests are added to the regression suite and running in nightly builds<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Sprint Day 9 to 10: Regression and Release Validation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Automated regression run:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Full regression suite executes automatically via CI\/CD pipeline<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Results are visible to the whole team on a shared dashboard<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Any new failures are triaged immediately: is this a product defect or a test issue?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Manual exploratory testing:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QA engineers use the time saved by automation on exploratory testing of edge cases and user experience quality<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Session-based exploratory testing generates defect and insight reports for product discussion<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Sprint Retrospective: Automation Health Review<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Add 10 minutes to retrospective for automation health:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What was the automation coverage delivered this sprint?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Did any tests become flaky? Who is assigned to fix them?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Did the regression suite run time increase? If yes, investigate root cause<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What is the trend line on defect escape rate? Is automation actually catching more bugs?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For teams using a structured retrospective process, NextAgile&#8217;s<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/workshop\/team-development-workshop-and-training\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Team Development Workshop<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> covers retrospective facilitation practices that include data-driven quality reviews.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Behavior-Driven Development as the Bridge Between QA and Product<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) is an approach to test automation that writes test scenarios in plain language (usually Given\/When\/Then format) before development begins. BDD scenarios become both the acceptance criteria for the story and the specification for the automated tests.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Why BDD improves test automation in agile:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Product Owners can read and validate scenarios without technical knowledge<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Developers implement to a specific behavioral specification<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QA engineers automate the exact scenarios the Product Owner agreed to<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The resulting automated tests are self-documenting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>BDD scenario example for a login feature:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0Given the user is on the login page<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0When the user enters a valid email and password<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0And the user clicks the Login button<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0Then the user should be redirected to their dashboard<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0And the dashboard should display the user&#8217;s first name<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This scenario is written before development begins. It serves as the acceptance criterion and is directly converted into an automated Cypress, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/playwright.dev\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Playwright<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, or <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.selenium.dev\/documentation\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Selenium<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> test script.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>BDD frameworks commonly used in agile teams:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cucumber (Java, Ruby, JavaScript): the most widely adopted BDD framework globally<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SpecFlow (C#\/.NET): Cucumber equivalent for .NET teams<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Behave (Python): BDD framework for Python development teams<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Playwright with TypeScript + Gherkin: emerging combination for modern web teams<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Continuous Integration Setup for Agile Test Automation<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Continuous integration (CI) is the infrastructure backbone of test automation in agile. Without CI, automated tests run when someone remembers to run them, which means they do not prevent defects from reaching the next sprint.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Minimum CI configuration for an agile Scrum team:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Unit tests:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Run on every commit to any feature branch. Failure blocks the pull request from merging. Result time: 2 to 5 minutes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Integration\/API tests:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Run on every commit to the main\/development branch. Result time: 5 to 15 minutes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Full regression suite:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Run nightly or on every release candidate build. Result time: 15 to 45 minutes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Smoke tests post-deployment:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Run after every deployment to any environment (staging, production). Result time: under 5 minutes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For teams using Azure DevOps pipelines, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI, the configuration patterns for each pipeline stage are standard and well-documented. NextAgile&#8217;s<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/workshop\/ai-for-agility-workshop\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AI for Agility Workshop<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> covers how AI-assisted tools like GitHub Copilot can help generate CI pipeline configuration files and review them for completeness.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Handling Common Test Automation Challenges in Agile Scrum Teams<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><b>Challenge 1: &#8220;We don&#8217;t have time for automation this sprint&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the most common and most destructive pattern in agile QA. Teams skip automation under sprint pressure, accumulating manual testing debt that compounds sprint over sprint.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Solution:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Make test automation a non-negotiable part of the Definition of Done. If a story ships without automated tests, it is not done. This is a team agreement enforced by the Scrum Master. Initially, add automation effort to story estimates so it is planned for, not squeezed in.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Challenge 2: Flaky tests eroding team trust<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When automated tests fail intermittently, teams start ignoring failures. Once ignored, the automation suite stops being a quality gate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Solution:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Implement a flaky test policy from Day 1. Any test that fails 3 times without a code change is quarantined (removed from the CI gate, tracked separately). It must be fixed or deleted within 5 business days by a named owner.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Challenge 3: QA engineers becoming a bottleneck<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If only QA engineers write and maintain automated tests, they become a bottleneck that limits test coverage to QA capacity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Solution:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Make test automation a shared team skill. Developers write unit tests for their own code. QA engineers focus on integration and scenario-level tests. Use BDD to make scenario authoring accessible to non-developers (Product Owners can write the Given\/When\/Then scenarios that QA engineers automate).<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Test automation in agile Scrum teams works when it is treated as a sprint commitment, not an afterthought. The practices in this guide, pre-sprint automation planning, sprint-day parallel test development, BDD for shared scenario authorship, and CI integration for continuous validation, collectively produce the environment where teams can ship every sprint with confidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For <a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/agile\/enterprise-scrum\/\">enterprise Scrum<\/a> teams scaling this practice across multiple ARTs or SAFe programs, the governance elements covered in the<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/agile\/agile-test-automation\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">pillar blog on Agile Test Automation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and the strategy blog become critical. NextAgile&#8217;s<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/agile-consulting-services\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">agile consulting services<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> support teams in building this practice from the ground up. Contact us at <\/span><a href=\"mailto:consult@nextagile.ai\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">consult@nextagile.ai<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Frequently Asked Questions<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><b>Q1. How do you integrate test automation into a Scrum sprint without slowing down delivery?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Start by including automation effort in story point estimates during refinement. If a story is estimated at 5 points and the automated test would take 1 point of effort, estimate 6 points total. This prevents automation from being treated as extra work and ensures sprint capacity accounts for it. Add &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/martinfowler.com\/articles\/continuousIntegration.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><b>automated tests passing in CI<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8221; to your Definition of Done so it is a planned deliverable, not a post-sprint afterthought.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q2. What is BDD and should Scrum teams use it?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) is a practice where test scenarios are written in plain language (Given\/When\/Then format) before development begins. These scenarios become both the acceptance criteria and the specification for automated tests. Scrum teams benefit from BDD when they struggle with ambiguous acceptance criteria, when Product Owners cannot read technical test scripts, or when QA is siloed from development. BDD creates a shared language for Product Owners, developers, and QA engineers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q3. Who should write automated tests in an <a href=\"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/agile\/agile-team-structure\/\">agile team<\/a>?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Test automation is a shared responsibility in agile. Developers write unit tests for their own code using TDD or test-alongside-code practices. QA engineers write integration, API, and scenario-level automated tests. Product Owners can write BDD scenarios (Given\/When\/Then) that QA engineers automate. The key is to define these responsibilities explicitly in your team working agreement and your Definition of Done.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q4. How do you prevent test automation debt in agile teams?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Prevent automation debt with three practices: first, include automation effort in every story estimate during refinement; second, make &#8220;automated tests written and passing in CI&#8221; a Definition of Done requirement; third, address flaky tests within 5 business days with a named owner. Without these three practices, automation debt accumulates silently and compounds until the test suite is too expensive to maintain and too unreliable to trust.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q5. What is the minimum CI setup a Scrum team needs for test automation?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The minimum viable CI setup for an agile Scrum team includes: unit tests that run on every pull request (2 to 5 minutes), integration tests that run on every merge to the main branch (5 to 15 minutes), and a full regression suite that runs nightly or on release candidates (15 to 45 minutes). Add deployment smoke tests for each environment push. This setup catches the most expensive defects at the cheapest point in the development cycle.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q6. How long does it take to implement test automation for a Scrum team starting from scratch?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Phase 1 (CI setup + first unit tests): 2 to 4 sprints. Phase 2 (50%+ unit coverage + API tests for core endpoints): 6 to 10 sprints. Phase 3 (Full pyramid including UI automation for key journeys + nightly regression suite): 12 to 18 sprints from zero. The fastest path is to start with a focused automation strategy, prioritize high-value tests first, and build consistently rather than trying to automate everything at once.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Highlights of Test Automation in Agile Agile testing activities consume 20 to 30% of total sprint effort when distributed correctly across developers, QA, and product owners (monday.com Agile Testing Guide, 2026). Teams that automate consistently catch bugs 60% earlier in the development lifecycle than teams that rely on end-of-sprint manual testing. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8201,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-agile"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8199"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8249,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8199\/revisions\/8249"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8201"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nextagile.ai\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}